HMS Sulphur RC Drilling Defines Shallow Mineralisation
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
ASX Announcement
17 July 2023
HMS Sulphur RC Drilling Defines Shallow Mineralisation
Striking Over 700m
Key Points:
• Final assay results have been received from the 30-hole (2,576m) reverse
circulation (RC) drilling program testing the HMS Sulphur Prospect at Mt McClure in
May-June 2023.
• Infill and extensional results include:
o YRLRC1131 - 9m @ 1.9g/t Au from 39m, including 6m @ 2.6g/t Au
o YRLRC1130 - 9m @ 1.9g/t Au from 151m, including 2m @ 4.9g/t Au
o YRLRC1138 - 5m @ 2.5g/t Au from 56m, including 3m @ 3.4g/t Au
o YRLRC1123 - 4m @ 2.8g/t Au from 136m
o YRLRC1132 - 6m @ 1.6g/t Au from 132m
o YRLRC1133 - 2m @ 4.8g/t Au from 24m, including 1m @ 7.9g/t Au
• Mineralisation has been defined over a strike length of 700m down to a maximum
vertical depth of 150m on a nominal 50m x 50m spacing.
• Mineralisation remains open at depth and along strike to the south.
• Results will be used to update the geological model at HMS Sulphur and, together
with previous results, will form the basis of an initial Mineral Resource Estimate
planned for the December 2023 quarter.
Commenting on the new results, Yandal Resources’ Managing Director Mr Tim Kennedy said:
“HMS Sulphur is the most advanced prospect outside of the footprint of the historical open cuts. It
was a compelling target due to the relatively shallow nature and simple geometry of mineralisation.
Being immediately along strike from our Success MRE provides some synergies in terms of potential
future development scenarios. We look forward to fully evaluating the results and with a view to
producing an initial MRE in the December quarter.”
Registered Address
Board Members
Gold Projects
Yandal Resources Limited
Tim Kennedy
Managing Director/CEO
Greg Evans
Non-Exec Chairman
Katina Law
Non-Exec Director
Greg Fitzgerald
Company Secretary
T
+61 8 9389 9021
E
yandal@yandalresources.com.au
W
www.yandalresources.com.au
Ironstone Well (100% owned)
Barwidgee (100% owned)
Mt McClure (100% owned)
Gordons (100% owned)
Shares on Issue 157,803,079
Share Price
$0.05
Market Cap
$7.7M
ASX Code
YRL
ACN 108 753 608
A
P
ABN 86 108 753 608
Level 1, U5/62 Ord Street
West Perth WA 6005
PO Box 1104
Nedlands WA 6909
Yandal Resources Ltd (ASX: YRL, “Yandal Resources” or the “Company”) is pleased to advise that
it has received final assay results from the RC drilling program completed at the HMS Sulphur
Prospect (M 36/691) within the Mt McClure (MMC) Gold Project in May-June 2023.
The Mt McClure Project is located 15km south-west of the historic Bronzewing gold mine and 10km
from the Orelia gold mine, both owned by Northern Star Resources Ltd (ASX: NST) in the southern
Yandal Belt (Figure 1). The project covers a total strike length of 17km of prospective stratigraphy and
includes several shallow historical open cut pits. Mineralisation extending beneath and adjacent to the
historical pits forms the basis of Mineral Resource Estimates totalling 2.25Mt @ 1.9g/t Au for
136,000oz(1). (1) Refer to the YRL ASX Announcements of 22 August, 6 September and 20 September 2022 for details of Resources
Figure 1 – Location map of the Mt McClure Project showing mines and key
prospects over regional geology
ASX Announcement 17 July 2023
Page 2
The recent results at HMS Sulphur represent a successful RC in-fill program, with 26 of the 30 holes
drilled returning significant intercepts (>0.5g/t Au). Results confirm mineralisation continuity over more
than 700m of strike and down to a depth of 150m vertical, with mineralisation open at depth and to
the south. Furthermore, higher-grade intercepts indicate that potential high-grade zones plunging
moderately to the south are present across the prospect, similar to the adjacent Success Open Pit
and nearby Orelia deposits.
The progression of the HMS Sulphur prospect demonstrates the discovery potential across the Mt
McClure Gold Project. Historic exploration focused on a single mineralised trend with early targets
defined by shallow supergene enrichment. The stratigraphic complexity suggests there may be
additional mineralised settings that may have been missed by previous explorers due to a focus on
shallow supergene gold anomalism similar to existing deposits such as Success. The surface and
regolith gold signatures dampened by potential supergene gold remobilisation/depletion has
somewhat masked the surface expression of HMS Sulphur. Similarly, there may be further additional
settings with near surface depletion that have not been followed up with deeper drilling or, in the case
of low-level surface anomalies, not previously drill tested. Yandal Resources believes that there is
potential for discoveries similar to HMS Sulphur and is committed to identifying and testing comparable
targets as part of its overall exploration strategy at Mt McClure.
TECHNICAL SUMMARY
HMS Sulphur RC Drilling Results
The HMS Sulphur RC program comprised 30 holes for 2,576m providing drill coverage at a nominal
50m x 50m spacing along a 700m strike length of the prospect. The program’s intent was to confirm
mineralisation continuity and provide sufficient drill coverage to enable the completion of an initial
Mineral Resource Estimate at HMS Sulphur. A combination of 1m and 4m composite RC samples
were collected and submitted for Au analysis by fire assay, with 1m samples collected across the
target intervals. Results for all submitted samples have been received.
All significant assay results and collar locations are provided in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.
The results build on previous RC drilling completed in 2021 and 2022 (see ASX 23rd March 2021, 17th
November 2022, and 23rd Feb 2023).
Geology
The HMS Sulphur prospect is situated in the footwall below the Success deposit, directly north of the
historic open pit. Current interpretations suggest mineralisation occupies an iron rich chert and shale
unit. Iron rich chert sub-crop has been mapped at the approximate surface projection of the host unit.
This host unit dips approximately 50° to 60° to the east-northeast and overlies a basalt/dolerite
sequence. Overlying the host unit is a sequence of felsic volcanic and fine-grained sediments.
The regolith across the prospect is interpreted to be a partially eroded in-situ regime with a thin veneer
of transported colluvium in places. Weathering is deep across the prospect, with fresh rock only
evident at vertical depths greater than 100m.
ASX Announcement 17 July 2023
Page 3
YRLRC1148
5m @ 1.2g/t Au from 30m
YRLRC1144
6m @ 1.3g/t Au from 74m
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1138
5m @ 2.5g/t Au from 56m
Incl. 3m @ 3.4g/t Au
YRLRC1132
6m @ 1.6g/t Au from 132m
A’’
YRLRC1133
2m @ 4.8g/t Au from 24m
incl. 1m @ 7.9g/t Au
YRLRC1130
9m @ 1.9g/t Au from 151m
incl. 2m @ 4.9g/t Au
A’’
YRLRC1131
9m @ 1.9g/t Au from 39m
incl. 6m @ 2.6g/t Au
YRLRC1126
3m @ 1.3g/t Au from 146m
YRLRC1125
5m @ 1.5g/t Au from 69m
YRLRC1123
4m @ 2.8g/t Au from 136m
YRLRC1122
5m @ 2.0g/t Au from 109m
Success
Figure 2 – HMS Sulphur drill hole plan showing location of May 2023 RC collars coloured by maximum downhole Au
(g/t) with selected significant intercepts labelled.
ASX Announcement 17 July 2023
Page 4
Mineralisation
Mineralisation is similar in style to that of the adjacent Success deposit. Current interpretations indicate
mineralisation occupies a 2m to 10m wide zone within an iron rich chert and shale unit. The geometry of
mineralisation is relatively simple and concordant with stratigraphy. There is evidence of minor gold
depletion down to 40m vertical. Mineralisation is characterised by quartz-carbonate veining and sulphides
(dominantly pyrite, between 5-20% as veins or bands) or abundant iron-oxides (after pyrite). Quartzcarbonate veining includes massive veins and smaller vein sets, with some evidence of brecciation
observed in chips.
Combined with previous RC drilling and a small number of historic RC holes, mineralisation is now defined
over 700m of strike and down to a vertical depth of 150m. Broader and higher-grade zones are evident,
and like the Success deposit, appear to occupy a moderate south plunge. Mineralisation remains open
both at depth and along strike to the south. Of particular interest is the southern projection of the host unit
that is interpreted to occur just west of the Success deposit, within the footwall of the current 75Koz @
1.9g/t Au Success MRE (refer to Yandal Resources Ltd ASX announcement dated 6 September 2022 for
full details).
Figure 3 - YRLRC1130 chip tray photo, showing 1m intervals from 151m to 160m (left to right), Au grade in g/t annotated in figure,
with a length weighted intercept of 9m @ 1.9g/t Au. The intervals contain laminated to finely banded chert and shales, with cloudy
grey quartz veining and 5-20% pyrite as fine disseminations, blebs, filling fractures, and laminations within veining. Higher grades
are associated with increased pyrite, chlorite-silica alteration, and trace arsenopyrite. The interval ends above weakly to moderately
sheared chlorite-carbonate-sericite altered mafic.
Implications for Future Exploration
The adjacent Success deposit displays strong supergene enrichment compared to HMS Sulphur, which
shows evidence of gold depletion in the near surface. The occurrence of possible gold depletion in the
upper part of the regolith profile across HMS Sulphur, despite its proximity to Success, suggests locally
dynamic variation in supergene gold remobilisation. The above will prompt a review of low-level oxide
anomalies adjacent to existing deposits across the Mt McClure Gold Project. Additionally, any other lowlevel linear near-surface anomalies will also be reviewed.
ASX Announcement 17 July 2023
Page 5
ASX Announcement 17 July 2023
Page 6
Figure 4 – West facing longitudinal section across HMS Sulphur showing all RC drilling and significant results (north to the right side of page). Location of the
Success Open Pit and Outline of the Success HW lode is indicated on the left of the long-section.
Figure 5 – North facing cross-section through HMS Sulphur. See collar plan (Figure 2) and longitudinal section
(Figure 4) for section location. Showing preliminary geological interpretation and significant intercepts.
ASX Announcement 17 July 2023
Page 7
LOOKING AHEAD
The Company has a very active Q3-Q4 2023 planned with priority exploration activities, including;
1. Complete interpretation of RC drilling at the HMS Sulphur Prospect Mount McClure that will
enable an initial Mineral Resource Estimate for that prospect.
2. Arrange access approval for drill testing targets at Ironstone Well/Barwidgee, including
Quarter Moon, Oblique and the New England prospects. RC drill test key prospects.
3. Follow-up significant air-core drill results over structural and geochemical targets at Mt
McClure and Ironstone Well/Barwidgee.
4. Follow-up of targets highlighted in the recent independent geological targeting studies at
Gordons (completed by Ben McCormack of Outlier Geoscience) and Ironstone
Well/Barwidgee (completed by Mike Outhwaite of Lithify Pty Ltd).
5. Complete 3D modelling of historic and recent drilling data at MMC to establish controls on
potential higher-grade plunging shoots for follow-up drill testing.
Authorised by the board of Yandal Resources
For further information please contact:
Tim Kennedy
Managing Director
Yandal Resources Limited
yandal@yandalresources.com.au
ASX Announcement 17 July 2023
Greg Fitzgerald
Company Secretary
+61 8 9389 9021
yandal@yandalresources.com.au
Page 8
About Yandal Resources Limited
Yandal Resources listed on the ASX in December 2018 and has a portfolio of advanced gold exploration projects in
the highly prospective Yandal and Norseman-Wiluna Greenstone Belts of Western Australia.
Yandal Resources’ gold project locations.
Yandal Resources Ltd - Mineral Resource Summary
Deposit
Ironstone Well
Flushing Meadows1
Mt McClure
Challenger2
Success3
Parmelia4
Sub-total - MMC
Gordons
Gordon’s Dam5
Grand-total6
Tonnes
(‘000s)
2,141
2,141
Indicated
Grade
(g/t)
Au
(oz)
1.3
91,000
1.3
91,000
Inferred
Grade
(g/t)
Au
(oz)
5,245
1.1
177,000
718
1,255
252
2,225
1.9
1.9
2.1
1.9
365
7,835
1.7
1.3
Tonnes
(‘000)
Total
Grade
(g/t)
Au
(Oz)
7,386
1.1
268,000
44,000
75,000
17,000
136,000
718
1,255
252
2,225
1.9
1.9
2.1
1.9
44,000
75,000
17,000
136,000
20,000
333,000
365
9,976
1.7
1.3
20,000
424,000
Tonnes
(000’s)
Due to the effects of rounding totals may not represent the sum of the individual components
1. Reported above 0.5g/t Au lower cut-off grade, refer to Yandal Resources Ltd ASX announcement dated 4 November 2020 for full
details. 2. Reported above 1.0g/t Au lower cut-off grade, refer to Yandal Resources Ltd ASX announcement dated 22 August 2022
for full details 3. Reported above 1.0g/t Au lower cut-off grade, refer to Yandal Resources Ltd ASX announcement dated 6 September
2022 for full details.4. Reported above 1.0g/t Au lower cut-off grade, refer to Yandal Resources Ltd ASX announcement dated 20
September 2022 for full details 5. Reported above 1.0g/t Au lower cut-off grade, refer to Yandal Resources Ltd ASX announcement
dated 6 April 2023 for full details 6. All Resources are reported as global estimates, not constrained by optimised pit shells.
ASX Announcement 17 July 2023
Page 9
Competent Person Statement
The information in this document that relates to Exploration Results, geology and data compilation is based
on information reviewed or compiled by Mr Christopher Oorschot, a Competent Person who is a Member
of The Australasian Institute Geoscientists. Mr Oorschot is the Exploration Manager for the Company, is a
full-time employee and holds options in the Company. Mr Oorschot has sufficient experience which is
relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he
is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code
for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Oorschot consents to the
inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it
appears.
The information in this announcement that relates to the Flushing Meadows, Mt McClure and Gordons
Dam Mineral Resource Estimates is based on information compiled and generated by Andrew Bewsher,
an employee of BM Geological Services Pty Ltd (“BMGS”). Both Andrew Bewsher and BMGS hold shares
in the company. BMGS consents to the inclusion, form and context of the relevant information herein as
derived from the original resource reports. Mr Bewsher has sufficient experience relevant to the style of
mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which is being undertaken to
qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the JORC ‘Australasian Code for Reporting
of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’.
YRL confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information
included in the original market announcement. The company confirms that the form and context in which
the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market
announcement.
Forward Looking Statements
This document may contain certain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but
are not limited to, statements concerning Yandal Resources Limited’s (Yandal’s) current expectations,
estimates and projections about the industry in which Yandal operates, and beliefs and assumptions
regarding Yandal’s future performance. When used in this document, words such as “anticipate”, “could”,
“plan”, “estimate”, “expects”, “seeks”, “intends”, “may”, “potential”, “should”, and similar expressions are
forward-looking statements. Although Yandal believes that its expectations reflected in these forwardlooking statements are reasonable, such statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors, some of which are beyond the control of Yandal and no assurance can be given that
actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. Drilling results presented indicate
geological potential for mineralisation but there can be no certainty that these results will eventually form
part of a Mineral Resource Estimate.
ASX Announcement 17 July 2023
Page 10
Table 1 – HMS Sulphur - Summary of significant RC drilling assay results (>0.1g/t Au).
Prospect
Hole
Id
Sample
type
From (m)
To
(m)
Interval
(m)
Au
(g/t)
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1121
RC 1m
37
38
1
0.7
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1121
RC 1m
40
41
1
0.5
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1122
RC 1m
109
114
5
2.0
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1123
RC 1m
136
140
4
2.8
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1124
RC 1m
37
39
2
0.8
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1125
RC 1m
62
63
1
0.7
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1125
RC 1m
65
67
2
0.9
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1125
RC 1m
69
74
5
1.5
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1126
RC 1m
141
143
2
0.6
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1126
RC 1m
146
149
3
1.3
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1127
RC 1m
42
43
1
0.6
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1127
RC 1m
48
50
2
0.9
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1128
RC 1m
80
84
4
0.6
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1128
RC 1m
88
89
1
1.4
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1129
RC 1m
105
106
1
4.5
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1129
RC 1m
117
118
1
0.7
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1129
RC 1m
121
123
2
0.8
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1130
RC 1m
151
160
9
1.9
including
156
158
2
4.9
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1131
RC 1m
11
12
1
0.5
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1131
RC 1m
39
48
9
1.9
including
42
48
6
2.6
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1132
RC 1m
122
123
1
1.0
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1132
RC 1m
129
130
1
0.7
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1132
RC 1m
132
138
6
1.6
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1133
RC 1m
24
26
2
4.8
including
24
25
1
7.9
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1134
RC 1m
123
126
3
0.6
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1135
RC 1m
12
13
1
1.2
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1135
RC 1m
20
21
1
0.6
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1135
RC 1m
27
28
1
0.6
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1136
RC 1m
83
85
2
1.0
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1137
RC 1m
33
35
2
1.7
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1138
RC 1m
56
61
5
2.5
including
57
60
3
3.4
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1139
RC 1m
12
13
1
2.2
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1140
RC 1m
108
110
2
0.9
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1141
RC 1m
NSA
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1142
RC 1m
56
57
1
0.8
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1143
RC 1m
NSA
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1144
RC 1m
74
80
6
1.3
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1145
RC 1m
NSA
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1146
RC 1m
NSA
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1147
RC 1m
78
80
2
1.2
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1148
RC 1m
30
35
5
1.2
ASX Announcement 17 July 2023
Comment
finished @ EOH
Page 11
Prospect
Hole
Id
Sample
type
From (m)
To
(m)
Interval
(m)
Au
(g/t)
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1149
RC 1m
59
60
1
0.7
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1150
RC 1m
27
28
1
0.5
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1150
RC 1m
31
32
1
0.6
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1150
RC 1m
36
37
1
0.9
Comment
Table 2 – HMS Sulphur RC collar location summary for this release.
Prospect
Hole ID
Hole
type
East
(m)
North
(m)
Azimuth
(degrees)
Dip
(degrees)
Total
depth
(m)
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1121
RC
296266
6955192
256
-60
48
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1122
RC
296337
6955222
259
-60
120
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1123
RC
296364
6955227
255
-60
150
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1124
RC
296254
6955227
258
-60
42
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1125
RC
296287
6955237
253
-60
75
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1126
RC
296366
6955253
252
-60
160
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1127
RC
296248
6955282
256
-60
50
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1128
RC
296288
6955287
255
-60
100
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1129
RC
296324
6955297
258
-60
140
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1130
RC
296361
6955306
258
-60
180
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1131
RC
296215
6955377
253
-60
60
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1132
RC
296311
6955398
255
-60
150
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1133
RC
296184
6955417
258
-60
30
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1134
RC
296285
6955445
256
-60
140
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1135
RC
296160
6955461
249
-60
36
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1136
RC
296232
6955480
254
-60
100
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1137
RC
296163
6955516
254
-60
50
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1138
RC
296189
6955524
256
-60
70
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1139
RC
296129
6955556
256
-60
50
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1140
RC
296222
6955584
261
-60
130
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1141
RC
296132
6955608
259
-60
56
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1142
RC
296159
6955617
257
-60
80
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1143
RC
296110
6955657
258
-60
47
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1144
RC
296161
6955668
259
-60
100
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1145
RC
296107
6955708
255
-59
50
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1146
RC
296137
6955716
256
-60
100
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1147
RC
296129
6955762
257
-60
100
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1148
RC
296073
6955787
259
-60
42
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1149
RC
296097
6955791
258
-60
75
HMS Sulphur
YRLRC1150
RC
296189
6955416
256
-60
45
ASX Announcement 17 July 2023
Page 12
Appendix 1 – Mt McClure
JORC Code (2012) Table 1, Section 1 and 2
Mr Christopher Oorschot, Exploration Manager of Yandal Resources compiled the information in Section 1 and Section 2 of the following JORC Table 1 and is the
Competent Person for those sections. The following Table and Sections are provided to ensure compliance with the JORC Code (2012 edition) requirements for the
reporting of Exploration Results.
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Sampling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips,
or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools
appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down
hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These
examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of
sampling.
•
•
•
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample
representivity and the appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used.
•
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material
to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work
has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse
circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3
kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In
other cases more explanation may be required, such as where
there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine
nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
•
ASX Announcement 17 July 2023
A total of 58 Reverse Circulation (RC) holes have been drilled across the HMS Sulphur Prospect for a
total of 5,299m. 45 of these RC holes were completed by Yandal Resources for a total of 4,142m, while
there are 13 historic RC holes for a total of 1,157m. Drill holes vary in depth from 30m to 180m.
Yandal Resources (YRL) RC Samples were collected via a rig-mounted static cone splitter, splitting the
sample in an approximate 87.5%/12.5% ratio. The approximate 12.5% split is retained for a 1m sample.
1m samples are then sent to a lab for further analysis. 4m composites were collected outside of
mineralised intervals. 4m composite samples were collected by using a scoop or spear to collect a
sample from the 1m interval 87.5% (bulk) split retained in ordered and labelled green bags. Samples
from every four metres are combined to form a four-metre composite which are then sent to the lab for
analysis. If the composite samples are anomalous for gold, then individual 1m samples are collected
from the 4m interval and submitted to a lab for analysis.
For historical drilling, sampling practices by previous operators are assumed to be industry standard at
that time. Sampling procedures would be comparable to those applied by Yandal Resources as per the
above but with variations in the type of splitter used etc.
For YRL RC drilling, the cone splitter is regularly cleaned and inspected. The 1m bulk samples are
stored in labelled green bags and laid out in drill order. These bulk samples are regularly inspected for
contamination, and the volume of the bulk sample is monitored. These bulk samples are retained until
all results are received and may be used to collect additional field duplicates to verify lab results, logged
geology or any other form of analysis. If the bulk sample appears visually low in volume or weight, this
is recorded with the sample details. The same applies for damp or wet samples.
For all results, RC drilling was used to obtain 1m samples from which a portion, between 1-3kg in weight,
was crushed and pulverised to produce a 50g charge for fire assay with an AAS (atomic absorption
spectroscopy) finish for gold determination with a 0.01ppm detection limit.
Page 13
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Drilling
techniques
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer,
rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core
diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, facesampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by
what method, etc).
•
•
For YRL RC drilling, a 139mm diameter face sampling bit and hammer was used.
For historical RC drilling, a 5’ ¼ inch face sampling bit and hammer was used.
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample
recoveries and results assessed.
•
For YRL holes, RC drilling recoveries are visually assessed by the supervising geologist, and any lowvolume or weight samples are recorded, along with any damp or wet samples. Drill depths are routinely
verified at the completion of each drill rod (every 6m). The cone splitter is checked for each drill site to
ensure it is completely upright and level. Sample collection from the splitter by drilling off-siders is
monitored for any inefficiencies. For deeper holes, larger drilling equipment is used, with boosted air
pressure, to ensure samples are recovered, and groundwater is reasonably controlled.
Based on current data, no grade bias is associated with lower/higher volume/weight samples. There
have only been minimal wet or damp samples across all YRL drilling.
For historic RC drilling, exact records of measures applied to manage or monitor sample recoveries
have not been preserved. It is assumed that previous project operators used industry standard
procedures comparable to those used by YRL above.
For YRL drilling, all RC holes have been logged in full by a qualified and experienced geologist. RC
chips and fines from each 1m interval drilled are inspected and logged for colour, weathering, lithology,
deformation, veining and mineralisation. All 1m samples are wet-sieved and retained in labelled and
annotated chip trays. Chip trays are stored on-site for review and then transported to Perth for longterm storage. The quality of logging information is considered sufficient to support appropriate Mineral
Resource Estimation studies.
Historic geological logging is limited in detail but provides sufficient information regarding lithology,
weathering, and mineralisation. It is assumed that previous project operators used industry standard
logging procedures comparable to those used by YRL above.
Data captured through geological logging by a geologist is qualitative in nature.
In addition to geological logging, the magnetic susceptibility of each interval is measured using a KT-10
magnetic susceptibility metre, with a sensitivity of 1x10-6 SI Units. Magnetic susceptibility readings are
quantitative in nature.
In addition to geological logging, down-hole gamma probes were applied to a select number of holes
that remained open post-drilling to collect down-hole density data, accurate to within 0.1g/ccm. Gamma
and density data are quantitative in nature.
YRL RC drilling utilised a rig mounted cone splitter installed directly below an in line with the rig mounted
cyclone. A 1-3kg sub sample is collected into a calico bag labelled with a unique alpha-numeric ID. Most
samples collected were dry, if samples were damp or wet, this was noted with the sample records.
Historic samples were likely collected using either a rig mounted or portable riffle splitter.
For all YRL RC drilling, samples are dried at 100°C to constant mass, crushed to <10mm and pulverised
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the samples.
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and
grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Logging
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate
Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical
studies.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc) photography.
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections
logged.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Sub-sampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core
taken.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and
whether sampled wet or dry.
ASX Announcement 17 July 2023
•
•
Page 14
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of
the sample preparation technique.
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages
to maximise representivity of samples.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of
the in situ material collected, including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half sampling.
Commentary
•
•
•
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the
material being sampled.
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and
laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is
considered partial or total.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF
instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the
analysis including instrument make and model, reading times,
calibra
Share your feedback
Discover